| |
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
home > art > resident artists |
Tim Craker |
Go to Tim Craker's website>> www.timcraker.comGo to the dot-net-dot-au page >>Click on the images below to view larger versions.
|
|
|
In July 2011, Australian artist Tim Craker returned to Malaysia to take up the first artist's residency at Hotel Penaga in George Town, Penang in July 2011. During the residency he created the installation sculpture Beyond the Pail, now on display in front of the main hotel entrance. Tim was also an artist-in-residence at Rimbun Dahan in 2006.
Beyond the Pail, plastic buckets & cable ties, ca. 160cm diameter, 2011. Artist’s statement: Beyond the Pail is an assemblage of twelve ten-gallon yellow translucent plastic buckets, suspended in space and able to rotate about its vertical axis. The works’s construction is based on the dodecahedron, one of the five Platonic solids, each side of which is a pentagon. The work stems from a fascination with both the everyday object, released from its usual purpose, and the possibilities of combination that it may offer. The bucket, in this case, is no longer a functional object, but becomes an element of a larger construction that refers to the basic geometry of the natural world - the underlying patterns that are both decorative and seminal - the perfection of which is alleviated by the random positioning of the buckets’ handles. Suspended and rotating gently in passing breezes, Beyond the Pail provides gentle subversion of quotidian functionality, while making visual reference to - amongst other things - viral particles, Buckminster-Fuller’s geodesic domes (a local example of which is situated adjacent to the Komtar tower here in Georgetown), pollen grains and spaceships. Beyond the pail, certainly! Beyond the pale, I hope not. Tim Craker Artists' Statement from the Travelling Exhibition dot-net-dot-au, 2008
My overwhelming impression of Malaysia – gathered from many previous visits, as well as my residency - was primarily pattern, both natural and man-made. From the tiling of Kuala Lumpur pavements to the lattice of tropical vegetation against the sky, my eye was taken by the prevalence and variety of pattern - botanical, Islamic and industrial. Pattern is by definition repeated units, and a pattern is discerned through identification of these units, their repetition and interrelationship. Patterns can be merely decorative – children make patterns with seashells at the beach, for example – but we also talk of seeing a pattern, when we discern a connection between disparate objects or events, which hints at a meaning behind them. One stimulus for the work is a fascination with pattern and how it “works”; another is the excitement of generating substantial pieces from myriad small, unregarded and everyday objects and things. Several months ago I read in one of the weekend newspaper magazines a regular article about someone’s “favourite things”. This particular week one of the objects was a small length of an enormously long daisy chain, made as an entry in a sculpture competition by the person’s nine-year-old daughter, Lola. Part of Lola’s artist’s statement was: “I like daisy chains because you start with something little and end with something big.”
I tore the page out, took it to my studio and stuck Lola’s quotation in my journal. Above: detail of 'Thought Pattern', plastic chinese soup spoons, nylon thread. 250 x 400cm. 2007Plastic disposable materials have been chosen not only for their “transformative potential”, but because they are cheap (nine hundred plastic cups are still affordable, for example!), readily available, light, durable and easily worked. Safety fencing is also a cheap and abundant material – what excitement to buy fifty metres of it! The materials one uses carry a whole set of meanings, though, which are part - even if on a subconscious level - of why they are chosen and the meanings the work may suggest. In Malaysia during my 2006 residency, I was invited to be part of an exhibition entitled “Feed Me!”. The curatorial theme was an exploration of food and its cultural and social significance. I thought of the role that a common interest in food – recipes, ritual, preparation, eating – has played (and continues to play) in the successful meeting of my family with my Malaysian partner and his family. I considered, on a broader scale, the importance of food - in all its various manifestations - in intercultural relations. Food is sustenance, embodies tradition, and demonstrates familial love and care. It also epitomises cultural difference – while offering the means of transcending it... Food utensils have been objects and subjects I have often returned to – I realise, in retrospect - in my work. Aside from the tactile attractions of the immediately-recognisable and particular shapes, maybe what I return to is the symbolic representation of order, of ritual, of “civilised” ingestion, of the set table, of sitting down to dinner and conversations over a meal – and what that might stand against. The materials are plastic and non-degradable – symptomatic of a throw-away society. They have little aesthetic value – their design criteria value low cost first, then functionality. They are disposable and “single-use”, yet fill kitchen cupboards, builders’ skips and landfill everywhere. They are the products of a petrochemical industry itself responsible for vast environmental damage - in accessing raw materials, in the by- products of manufacture and in the consumption of the end-product hydrocarbon fuels.
What information might a pattern contain, and how is it encoded? Does the botanical information always lie within the plastic screen? Is the screen something we see through, or something that prevents our access? At what point does a disrupted pattern become mere chaos? When do patterns within patterns become too complex to apprehend?
|
|
Last updated 18 Aug 2011. |
||
|
home · about · art · architecture · environment |